I is for—Ixchel
I think we can all probably agree that
by this point in the narrative, no matter her dreamlike seductiveness
earlier on, Dread Lady Ixchel has become very firmly a monster, both
morally and visibly. This mostly has to do with the degeneration of
her chosen vessel, poor Miss Adaluz, whose suicide and resurrection
Rook oversaw in A Book of Tongues. Now she's looking for a
replacement body, but just as Larry Cohen noted in his film Q: The
Winged Serpent, Mexica faith-based magic has one very particular
limitation—nine times out of ten, it requires a willing
sacrifice. And trying to make someone “love” you enough to lay
down their life “for” you so that you can possess their body
after it's vacant is sometimes a little bit harder than it seems.
Luckily for Ixchel—and unluckily, for everybody else—she always
has a fall-back position.
J is for—Johnson (Andrew)
Who was President in 1867, exactly?
Chances are, if I was actually American, this might not have proved
such a goddamn stumper. As it is, if I had a dollar for every time I
mistook Andrew Johnson (1986-1869) for Andrew Jackson (aka “Old
Hickory”, 1829-1837) while writing and editing all three books, I'd
have a nice little nest-egg. One way or the other, Johnson comes a
little more directly into the narrative in A Tree—I vaguely
discuss his failed impeachment, have him conferring with Allan
Pinkerton via ectoplasmic avatar, and note that his admission of
Nebraska to the Union makes him the sort of guy who might be okay
with signing off on a new state, in theory. Given the timing, he
seems like a President who'd understand that in a world where hexes
can suddenly cooperate, matters hexalogical would really have to be
put on the table from now on, along with whatever arcanistric
measures could be raised to deal with them. (I also make him a bit of
a racist, for which I apologize, especially if it wasn't true.)
Tomorrow: K and L!
(I also make him a bit of a racist, for which I apologize, especially if it wasn't true.)
ReplyDeleteNah, Johnson was eventually in favor of emancipation, but he also broke with his party over Reconstruction because he wouldn't sign into law the full legal equality of freed slaves; the Republicans overrode him and the civil rights bill went through, but I think you're safe making him a bit of a racist. I haven't even studied him that much.
Excellent! Racist he remains.
ReplyDelete